The tinkerer
The incentives have changed.
Note This post is mostly a dump of internal reflections and ideas that I've collected to make sense of my world. A world where I often interact with different personality types, different value systems and different perspectives. This post aims in no way to dictate a position, make a statement or provide judgment on anyone. If you are easily triggered online, don't read it.
I don't often engage in online commentary. I've had a reddit account for more than 19 years. I've been online since the days of Altavista and Geocities. For almost all this time, and even today, I've mostly been a quiet observer.
Over the years I've watched the internet shape an entire generation of thinkers. It enabled people like me, and many others, to explore, learn and tinker.
In the early days there were many different kinds of tinkerers, but for the purpose of this post I'll simplify things and mention two broad archetypes.
Excuse the generalization.
The hacker: community oriented. Pushes boundaries in pursuit of knowledge.
The hustler: motivated by building products. Delivering value. Monetizing.
Both archetypes have always existed online (and IRL). And to be clear, neither one is inherently good or bad. In fact they often depend on each other. One builds things because they are interesting. The other figures out how to package, distribute and scale them.
But if you look back at the early internet, the hacker spirit dominated the culture.
Forums, IRC channels, mailing lists and obscure documentation pages were filled with people sharing discoveries. People reverse engineering systems. People writing tools because they were curious if something could be done.
Knowledge had status.
Understanding how things worked mattered.
If you figured something out and wrote about it, people respected you. If you built a clever tool and released it publicly, people used it and improved it.
The incentive structure rewarded curiosity.
That environment created a culture of tinkering. People learned systems from the bottom up. They broke things, rebuilt them and shared what they discovered.
Over time, the center of gravity shifted.
As the internet matured, the incentives slowly changed. The focus moved from understanding systems to producing outcomes. From exploration to output. From curiosity to leverage.
Naturally, the capitalist mindset became more dominant.
Again, this is not inherently bad. Abstractions and easier tools are what allow technology to reach more people. Every generation of tools removes friction that existed before.
But every abstraction hides complexity.
And when complexity disappears from view, something else disappears with it: the incentive to explore.
The tinkerer thrives in environments where understanding the underlying system is valuable. Where depth matters. Where knowing why something works gives you an edge.
But when layers of complexity collapse behind simpler interfaces, the advantage shifts.
The skill is no longer knowing the system.
The skill becomes orchestrating outcomes.
For many people this is progress. Things become faster, more accessible and more productive.
But for the tinkerer, the person who grew up learning by pulling systems apart, that shift can feel unsettling.
Not because the tools are bad.
But because the culture around them changes.
When producing results no longer requires deep understanding, curiosity stops being the primary currency.
Output becomes the currency.
And when that happens, the hacker archetype starts to feel like it is losing its home.
Not because it disappeared.
But because the environment that once rewarded it changed.
ā Ismael.